
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Fri, Apr 22, 2022 - 21:08:59
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Effects of import competition on average economic status} 
  \label{table_hiscam_cl} 
\begin{tabular}{@{\hspace{-10pt}}l@{\hspace{-10pt}}cccc} 
\toprule 
 & (1) & (2) & (3) & (4)\\ 
\midrule  
\\[-2.1ex] $\Delta\textrm{IPW}_t$ & $-$0.067$^{**}$ & $-$0.073$^{***}$ & $-$0.047$^{**}$ & $-$0.101$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.026) & (0.026) & (0.020) & (0.037) \\ 
 \addlinespace 
\midrule  
Controls &  & x & x & x \\ 
Initial Mf x year &  &  & x &  \\ 
Constituency trends &  &  &  & x \\ 
Observations & 1,389 & 1,389 & 1,389 & 1,389 \\ 
R$^{2}$ & 0.240 & 0.243 & 0.306 & 0.675 \\ 
Adjusted R$^{2}$ & 0.239 & 0.240 & 0.302 & 0.510 \\ 
\bottomrule 
\textit{Note:}  & \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^{*}$p$<$0.1; $^{**}$p$<$0.05; $^{***}$p$<$0.01} \\ 
 & \multicolumn{4}{l}{\parbox[t]{0.4\textwidth}{Stacked first difference estimates,
        at the constituency level, for 1880--1890, 1890--1900, 1900-1910.
        Dependent variable is change in average economic status.
        All models include year fixed effects. (2)--(4) add controls
        for lagged manufacturing employment and
        lagged average economic status;
        (3) includes 1880 manufacturing employment interacted with year
        dummy variables, (4) includes
        constituency fixed effects, which adjust for constituency-specific time
        trends.
        Standard errors clustered by county in parentheses.}} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\end{table} 
